Important Note: Redirection of Services to ChiCTR
We would like to inform you that the Clinical Trial Registry page will discontinue the function of updating trial information directly on this platform. However, you will still be able to view the existing registration details. For any updates to trial information, you can use the China Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) directly at https://www.chictr.org.cn. This change will be fully implemented by 2024-Aug-05. Thank you for your attention.
CUHK_CCT00453
2015-05-20
Prospective
CRE-2014.063-T
Health and Medical Research Fund
Health and Medical Research Fund
N/A
Winnie W. S. Mak
Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
39436577
wwsmak@psy.cuhk.edu.hk
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Winnie W. S. Mak
Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
39436577
wwsmak@psy.cuhk.edu.hk
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Internet-based mindfulness and rumination-focused cognitive behavioural therapy as selective prevention of anxiety and depression: A randomised controlled trial
Internet-based mindfulness and rumination-focused cognitive behavioural therapy as selective prevention of anxiety and depression: A randomised controlled trial
網上心理健康計劃
Internet-based mindfulness and rumination-focused cognitive behavioural therapy as selective prevention of anxiety and depression: A randomised controlled trial
Hong Kong
Yes
2014-03-05
Mental Health
Other
Psychological
Internet-based mindfulness and internet-based rumination-focused cognitive behavioural therapy
6 weeks, with 3-month follow-up
Internet-based education control
(1) score above 66th percentile on either measure of worry (≥ 47 on PSWQ) or rumination (40 ≥ on RRS), i.e., at elevated risk because of increased propensity to rumination/worry, (2) at least 18 of age, (3) read and understand Chinese and spoken Cantonese, (4) are computer literate, (5) have consistent access to the internet
(1) having a DSM IV diagnosis of current or past major depressive episodes, generalised anxiety disorder, manic episodes, and psychotic disorders , and (2) actively suicidal
18
999
Both Male and Female
Interventional
Randomized
Active
Single-blind
Parallel
2015-09-01
459
Not Yet Recruiting
The following measures will be assessed at pre-programme, post-programme, and 3-month follow-up.
Depression and anxiety. The 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale will be used to assess depression and anxiety symptoms, respectively. PHQ-9 has been validated and used widely in both medical settings and general population (1) for screening and monitoring the severity of depression with validated cut-offs. At the cut-off of 10 (range 0-27), PHQ-9 has the sensitivity of 0.88 and specificity of 0.88 in detecting major depressive disorder (2). GAD-7 is a brief scale for anxiety symptoms, with cut-offs for probable generalised anxiety disorder. It has good reliability, criterion, construct, factorial, and procedural validity (3). At the cut-off of 10 (range 0-21), GAD-7 has the sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.82 in detecting generalised anxiety disorder19. The M.I.N.I. will also be used at post- and 3-month follow-up to establish diagnostic status.
1. Martin A, Rief W, Klaiberg A, Braehler E. Validity of the brief patient health questionnaire mood scale (PHQ-9) in the general
2. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2001:16:606-613.
3. population. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2006;28(1):71-77
Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2006;166(10):1092-1097
The following measures will be assessed at pre-programme, post-programme, and 3-month follow-up.
Mediators
Rumination and worry. The Ruminative Response Scale of the Response Styles Questionnaire (RRS;1) is a 22-item self-report assessment on the frequency of rumination about the depressed mood, with items relating to the self, symptoms, causes and consequences of the mood. It is rated from 1 (almost never) to 4 (almost always). The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ; 2) is a 16-item scale assessing worry. It is rated from 1 (not at all typical of me) to 5 (very typical of me). They are the most commonly used scales to measure repetitive negative thinking and have been used among Chinese samples.
Mindfulness. The mostly commonly used mindfulness measure, the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ;3), will be used to assess five domain of mindfulness including nonreactivity, observing, acting with awareness, describing, and nonjudging. It consists of 39 items rated from 1 (never or very rarely true) to 5 (very often or always true). It has been translated into Chinese and used among local samples by the PI (Mak) and the co-I (Wong).
Behavioural activation. The 25-item Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS, 4) will be used to assess the level of behavioural activation and avoidance. It consists of four subscales rated from 0 (not at all) to 6 (completely): activation, avoidance/rumination, work/school impairment, and social impairment. Findings demonstrated adequate test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity using both non-clinical and depressed populations.
Moderator
Tolerance of ambiguity. The 22-item Multiple Stimulus Types Ambiguity Tolerance (MSTAT-I, 5) will be used to assess individual’s tolerance of ambiguity. It has satisfactory internal reliability (alpha = 0.86) and convergent validity. It is rated on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).
Receipt of other mental health services and taking of psychotropic medication. Participants will be asked if they are receiving any other mental health/psychiatric services and/or taking any psychotropic medication since they begin the internet-based interventions at post-survey and follow-up survey.
1. Treynor W, Gonzalez R, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Rumination Reconsidered: A Psychometric Analysis, Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2003;27:247-259.
2. Meyer TJ, Miller ML, Metzger RL, Borkovec TD. Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behavior Research and Therapy. 1990;28:487-495.
3. Baer RA, Smith GT, Hopkins J, Krietemeyer J, Toney L. Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment. 2006;13(1):27-45.
4. Kanter JW, Mulick PS, Busch AM, Berlin KS, Martell CR. The behavioral activation for depression scale (BADS): psychometric properties and factor structure. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2007:29(3):191-202.
5. McLain DL. The MSTAT-I: A new measure of an individual's tolerance for ambiguity. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1993;53(1):183-189.
2015-05-20
ChiCTR-IOR-15006470
2015-05-31
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
No documents yet. |